Five years since the Covid supplement – ‘member?

My notes for today:

We’re here today to remember the absolute relief people felt when the Covid supplement was announced.
The coronavirus supplement in 2020 showed that governments can choose to lift people out of poverty overnight. With the supplement, people were happier and healthier – able to buy fresh fruit and vegetables and the medications they needed. Many were able to actually find work in this time without the added survival pressures of poverty. Keeping people in poverty is unnecessary, and subsidies are no substitute to giving people cash to support themselves.
It shouldn’t take a crisis for governments to support their people to thrive. Current rates for all welfare payments are currently under the poverty line leaving millions struggling to feed and house themselves, let alone have the health, money and energy to participate in their community.
As we approach a budget and an election, we implore the current and prospective governments to commit to raising the rate of all welfare payments above the poverty line immediately. If Labor wanted to they could pass it next week.
To a likely crossbench with the balance of power – what can you ask for for your communities that will lift standards of living across the board? Welfare above the poverty line for all – jobseekers, students, youth, parents, seniors, disabled people. None of them deserve poverty. Nobody Deserves Poverty.

The fabulous artwork commissioned from Judy Kuo to march 5 years since the Covid supplement. If you’d like to contribute to the fee for the commission this is the link. If you donate $25+ you’ll get a free poster of the piece.
Today I’m in Canberra for a press conference marking five years since the introduction of the “Covid Supplement” – $550 a fortnight added to welfare payments for some months in 2020 while the initial lockdowns were in effect. 99% of the reason for doing it had to be Morrison and co seeing the lines snaking out of Centrelink offices as casual and other workers were set aside. Personally, I was on a 20 hr/week contract, but usually working full time hours, but when disability respites and day programs shut down – the places where all my work was – I was cut back to 20 max, and took hours from others working above their contracted hours in group homes.
I went back onto JobSeeker at that time, able to receive the supplement only some weeks, other weeks topped up by the base payment depending on my hours and how many were at penalty rates for weekends and the like. It kept me ticking along, knowing that bills were covered. And when I did lose my job, JobSeeker was still higher than it is now, and easier to survive on (oh and rent was way less).

I was able to keep seeing my private psych occupational therapist who got me started on dialectical behavioural therapy while I was on the waitlist, again, for the centre for psychotherapy. She’s the one who got me over the line for my dsp application in the end so money well spent. I was helped by family to keep seeing her after the supplement went and before I got back into public psych. Many don’t have that though and would have just bounced around trying to make do.

Not everyone got the supplement though – for example those on DSP didn’t get the supplement and there were some seriously considering transferring to JobSeeker at that time to be able to actually have more money coming in (a terrible option for them which I hope very few took up and were able to get back onto DSP if they did). International students are other non-citizen workers were also left without any support while being limited in their options to work or leave the country.
Unlike JobKeeper which was giving to business under the pretense they’d keep workers on when in reality many just boosted their bottom lines with it – the supplement and also the cash stimulus payments went directly to the people, who were then able to spend it how they chose to survive and make their lives better in that time. Yes, this wound up back in the shop tils. But that’s win-win. People get things they need and want and businesses get to tick along.
Raising welfare permanently above the poverty line would do that too – people would be able to spend their money on the things they need to survive and thrive. That could be groceries or healthcare, but it can also be things to bring joy and peace, like art supplies, or seeing friends occasionally for a coffee (we all know the importance of coffee shops in the economy and media and therefor our lives) or whatever little things spark joy. People deserve joy.

Join us (a group of people from antipoverty organisations) on Monday night to reminisce about what having welfare payments above the poverty line actually did for people. It’s the day before Jim’s Election Budget, so have a think about what you would want him to put in it to make life livable for people on welfare payments.

Talking about talking about poverty

Last night’s workshop was intense, but thank you for the opportunity to have my say!

My brief for last night was “How people in poverty communicate online, to each other, our allies and our detractors”

Social media and other online communities are a literal lifeline to people on welfare – It’s a relatively cheap way to get social contact using tools we already have to have for all the external obligations. 

For me it’s been an escape from IRL pressures  but also finding community and people with the same experiences-  you can vent about something and others might not have a solution but they can sympathise and they do that thing where they rely their similar experience and you feel less alone. Sometimes we can work through things together and solve problems  – with government, finding out about a program that isn’t advertised, with sourcing money for things, but often it’s just learning that you’re not a complete outlier. 

Just by sharing your experience you can reveal things to the general public that they just don’t realise – from the fact that you have to pay at foodbanks to reality of upfront costs for medicare items being the barrier to going at all regardless of how much you get back, or how much or how little indexation on payments is by showing them the raw dollar figures. 

Controlling your narrative in some way is more and more important whether that be on your own blog, or even on social media sites owned by someone else (no matter how little you align with their politics), it’s your post, you own it in that it has your name on it it’s not a part of a report or selectively quoted in media. Please do lock your account when needed, turn off replies, mute and block people liberally. 

Detractors: I try not to focus on them at a personal level – I might use their negative statements about poverty or disability or welfare to have my own rant from my own point of view, and that’s for the benefit of people who see themselves as allies and might want to both sides things, bringing it back to a real person. My blog posts are about showing what my life is like – and in relation to whatever has prompted it – I will try to pull facts and examples into it but sometimes it just becomes a rant. And that’s okay because it’s my space to have that rant. I want to be able to write more considered posts that actually have research and drafts, but my favourite posts are all off the cuff and in response to something immediate. 

Allies: These are the ones I put time into trying to convince of things, that we deserve things to be good not just slightly better. Also other people on or have previously been on welfare are sometimes hard to convince they deserve/d better and that it’s actually really hard now. 

Community – I suppose a huge frustration I’m having at the moment is the mismatch between the messaging from Labor and what they’ve really delivered for welfare recipients and this being reflected in their media. In opposition people felt they were on the side of ppl on welfare – but the rhetoric has switched back to workers only. Deserving/undeserving poor. The housing and cost of living crisis is being felt by everyone, which is up and down for empathy – people are seeing that it can be difficult for anyone, but 

Welfare recipients -are sick of politicians’ shit and the media and peak groups using them but nothing coming of it. 


What to think about when having conversations in an election context:

Bringing it back to reality – mantras or the parties are only as good as what they actually vote for – whether that’s to do with rhetoric in opposition about welfare or climate change, Promises like cashless debit card – cemented it in for some.

Labor – I’m not here to attack Labor, I’ll criticise anyone, and try to point out how they act in practice, and how it’s worth preferencing other parties or candidates over them if they would push for XYZ that you support in the event of a hung parliament – eg dental for kids is topical because of Tanya saying how Greens should be taking credit even though Labor legislated it to get Greens guarantee of supply for Gillard. 

Like many of you know it just hurts people more when politicians pretend or insist they care about you but then fail to actually do anything concrete to support you. 

Fear based messaging – you’ll have it worse under LNP etc is doing my head in- well I need carrots not sticks – I want Labor to promise me a god time not threaten a bad time with someone else.

So I’m hitting publish on this, not because it’s finished or at all refined but because I have other things to focus on today – Heading to Canberra tomorrow for a press conference on Thursday morning to mark 5 years since the covid supplement changed people’s lives for the better.

If you wanna catch up, come along for brekkie/coffee at Parliament House beforehand – RSVP here. 

Banner image for Marking the 5 year COVID supplement anniversary at Parliament House

 

 

What will YOU spend your $3 indexation on?

Mudgeting tin from the 50s

It’s here guys! After the webpage being embargoed for what seemed like forever, the March 20 indexation of welfare payments has finally come out, and are you ready to spend up?

Let’s start with the pension rates, since that’s what I get and what they claimed to have increased…

PensionsAdult Pension Rates Single* Previous Amount 20 Mar 2025 Increase Base $1,047.10 $1,051.30 $4.20 pf Supplement $83.20 $83.60 $0.40 pf Energy Supplement $14.10 $14.10 - pf Total $1,144.40 $1,149.00 $4.60 pf Partnered (each) Base $789.30 $792.50 $3.20 pf Supplement $62.70 $63.00 $0.30 pf Energy Supplement $10.60 $10.60 - pf Total $862.60 $866.10 $3.50 pf
Pensions indexation

On my partner rate pension, I’ll be getting $3.50 “extra” a fortnight in my bank account. Looking at yesterday’s Aldi receipt, that’s worth about 600g of tomatoes or 3 tins of tuna or 2 UHT milks.

Let’s add in that 80c rent assistance “boost” and the $4.30 a fortnight covers a couple tins of dog food. And you know that’s where I spend my money first before anything for us lol Fortunately my rent only went up $10 a week last year so I’m not as behind as some who’ll lose out from this, especially if the thresholds mean their rent assistance goes down this year :/ Looking to my Aldi receipt there is nothing under 80c on there, even my mineral water is 89c a bottle.

Rent Assistance - for payments under the Social Security ActMaximum Payment Family Situation Previous Amount 20 Mar 2025 Increase Single $211.20 $212.00 $0.80 pf Single, sharer $140.80 $141.33 $0.53 pf Couple $199.00 $199.80 $0.80 pf Partnered, illness-separated $211.20 $212.00 $0.80 pf Partnered, temporarily separated $199.00 $199.80 $0.80 pf Rent Threshold Family Situation Previous Amount 20 Mar 2025 Increase Single $149.00 $149.60 $0.60 pf Single, sharer $149.00 $149.60 $0.60 pf Couple $241.40 $242.40 $1.00 pf Partnered, illness-separated $149.00 $149.60 $0.60 pf Partnered, temporarily separated $149.00 $149.60 $0.60 pf Rent Ceiling Family Situation Previous Amount 20 Mar 2025 Increase Single $430.60 $432.27 $1.67 pf Single, sharer $336.74 $338.05 $1.31 pf Couple $506.74 $508.80 $2.06 pf Partnered, illness-separated $430.60 $432.27 $1.67 pf Partnered, temporarily separated $414.34 $416.00 $1.66 pf
Rent assistance indexation

For those on jobseeker, $3.10 a fortnight will find its way to your account. And the supplements aren’t going up any of course.

AllowancesAllowance Rates (JobSeeker Payment, Special Benefit) Family Situation Previous Amount 20 Mar 2025 Increase Single, 22 or over, no children $778.00 $781.10 $3.10 pf Single, 22 or over, with children $833.20 $836.50 $3.30 pf Single, 55 or over, after 9 months $833.20 $836.50 $3.30 pf Single, 22 or over, partial capacity to work (0-14 hours) $833.20 $836.50 $3.30 pf Partnered (each) $712.30 $715.10 $2.80 pf Single, principal carer of child, exempt from activity test* $1,007.50 $1,011.50 $4.00 pf * Rate includes amount of Basic Pension Supplement (for under Age Pension age recipients). Energy Supplement (JobSeeker Payment, Special Benefit)* Family Situation - under Age Pension age Previous Amount 20 Mar 2025 Increase Single, 22 or over, no children $8.80 $8.80 - pf Single, 22 or over, with children $9.50 $9.50 - pf Single, 55 or over, after 9 months $9.50 $9.50 - pf Single, 22 or over, partial capacity to work (0-14 hours) - $9.50 - pf Partnered (each) $7.90 $7.90 - pf Single, principal carer of child, exempt from activity test $12.00 $12.00 - pf Family Situation - over Age Pension age Previous Amount 20 Mar 2025 Increase Single $14.10 $14.10 - pf Partnered (each) $10.60 $10.60 - pf
JobSeeker indexation

They better not dare use us as election fodder. We will kick back.

If you appreciate my posts, please subscribe to get them free in your email as soon as I hit publish. Please also consider supporting me or buying me a present if you have the spare cash (welfare recipients please DO NOT BUY)

To election season!

All apologies, no action – Mutual Obligations must go NOW

Been doing some reminiscing of sorts in preparations for the 5th anniversary or the COVID supplement and the long pause of “mutual” obligations. I was NOT in a good place back then, but I was getting the covid supplement after my hours got dramatically cut after disability respites and day programs closed down and we got cut to minimum contracted hours wherever they could place us in residential settings. I was then still getting it when I did eventually lose my job, and was looking at my bank statements shocked to see my total Newstart payment (single) including rent assistance was only $90 less than my (partner) DSP and rent assistance now – $970 vs $1061.60.

We’re getting the “boost” of, I’m told, 0.4% thanks to low inflation from March $20, which’ll take it to around $1065, give or take. Thanks Labor!

The best part of getting DSP was the removal of mutual obligations. It left me free to participate in therapy, do my little advocacy stuff, help family and friends, and just exist peacefully as possible. I’ve actually been doing a small amount of paid work in the past year, mostly online, but also exam supervision and before that election work. Stuff I can do when I have the energy and mental capacity and things that take my interest. I’ve had people approach me about applying for (social) media work with more hours, and I’m not up for that yet consistently but yeah, I’m starting to see more how that could work for me, and for them, and the knowledge that I might actually be a useful engine is nice. It’s also great to know that I do have the DSP to back me up, even if I am working, if I need to step back there’s that.

Being on DSP and my own timetable means I can also torture myself by watching Senate estimates, such as the session last week with DEWR Secretary Natalie James and Minister Murray Watt.

Don’t know Ms James? Well there’s a helpful puff piece in The Mandarin today (out of paywall), hoping top humanise her after the session.

What I got from the session was that the department is not confident that people aren’t being suspended due to errors with their system. What they have done is stopped cancellations at this point, more due to the recent discovery that their guidelines say they’re not meant to cut off anyone who doesn’t have any money saved (which is basically everyone) – but that doesn’t mean they can’t just keep suspending people, which is effectively the same since you have no money if you’re not getting your welfare payment.

So the department doesn’t know if they’re cutting people off incorrectly (let alone illegally) and they seem to be happy to continue with enforcing mutual obligations. They’re happy with how it’s going, and seem more concerned about “provider viability” than whether people are being left without any money to feed and house themselves, about whether they’re putting people in danger of suicide or other misadventure.

They also don’t know how the 10, mostly Indigenous, people who died after being cut off due to a “bug” did die. And when pressed they stated that since the families didn’t contact Services Australia to inform them of a suicide or other cause of death they don’t know and haven’t investigated.

And that’s just those ten. We know others who are still owed money from being cut off incorrectly or illegally who haven’t received repayment, so there’s likely more out there who aren’t doing so well.

It’s a mess. And that’s without even getting to the well known issues people have with their providers cutting them off because they weren’t marked present for a meeting, or demanding people complete phone meetings in a cyclone when mutual obligations have been stopped in preparation for a disaster.

A screenshot from an email by 'Help' a Disability Employment Service owned by IntoWork says the following: "As you may be aware, Cyclone Alfred has intensified to a Category 2 system and is expected to make landfall between Brisbane, the Gold Coast, and the Sunshine Coast later this week. As the safety of our staff, customers, clients, and participants is our top priority all Help Employment offices will be closed on Thursday, 6 March, and Friday, 7 March. What does this mean for you? Employment Services: Our offices will be closed, but telephone appointments will continue as normal. Face-to-Face Appointments: Any scheduled in-person appointments will be rescheduled or changed to phone appointments. Your consultant will be in touch with further details. Please follow local emergency services' advice and stay safe during this time."

(I’m also concerned for the staff who are presumably at home preparing themselves and being made to make unnecessary phone calls to people)

I haven’t heard if the pause has even gone through to people on the Workforce Australia app or by SMS, but wouldn’t be surprised if people are notified after the fact like during the rolling pause at the start of the year.

So yeah, a sorta apology (“I absolutely and unreservedly apologise on behalf of the department that we cannot have full confidence in this system delivering what it’s intended to deliver”) for a known error but keeping the system that is still possibly illegally cutting people off their tiny subsistence payments while you get it looked into isn’t going to cut it anymore. You can’t just say sorry for a known error that’s killed people, and have related errors still under investigations and needing to be paid back (let alone compensated) and still say you trust in the system and are happy to have it doing this because you aren’t turning your mind to it.

Suspend mutual obligations now, while you get your house in order. But why would you when nothing but promotions and excuses came from Robodebt.

And that’s before we actually talk about how much harm, rather than the expected help, is caused by “providers”.

(Preferably get rid of them altogether and create a voluntary, effective, public job-getting support service that people actually WANT to engage with)

But my updated GTA has downloaded and I’m gonna go cause some chaos.

picture of someone in a hello kitty costume drinking bubble tea in front of a burning house.

Step By Step – Labor Hoping to get a Second Time Around

Who remembers the 90s family sitcom Step By Step?

Step by step
Day by day
A fresh start over
A different hand to play
The deeper we fall
The stronger we stay
And we’ll be better
The second time around
SO we’re getting Labor’s election promises now, ahead of a probably March 25 budget and some time before May 17 election. Today’s was building on their increased bulk billing incentives for concession card holders and kids, something I described as killing universal bulk billing. lol. Was I wrong though? The announcement today is trying to extend that to all Medicare card holders, but only if the GP becomes exclusively bulk billing. I have a  few concerns.
The rate for GPs to bulk bill will be $69.56 in the cities. My GP currently charges $80 upfront for those one concessions and $100 for regular Medicare card holders. Those rates seem pretty standard, and are higher in some places. So you’re asking GPs to take a $30+ cut per session to become bulk billing again.
It only applies if ALL patients are bulk billed. I’m sure many of us have had doctors in the past that have sometimes bulk billed (especially for follow up appointments or if they’ve asked us back) but also sometimes privately billed. So they won’t have that flexibility.
I’m going to assume it won’t, but I hope that GPs currently only bulk billing concession patients won’t lose those current incentives if they choose not to add regular patients to bulk billing.
The Medicare rebate remains around $43 for a regular level B consult, and doesn’t look to be going up any time soon. So privately billed patients who are then claiming rebates will continue to be $35-$55 out of pocket a session (using my GP’s current pricing).
There’s also concerns that this won’t apply to Mental Health and Enhanced Primary Care health planning sessions and these will continue to be a barrier to people seeking mental health and other allied health care.
There’s been lobbying around increasing the number of mental health (currently 10) and general allied health (currently 5 total) session people can claim on Medicare. Haven’t seen much about increasing the rebates for those (HUGE gaps huge huge gaps) especially with trying to keep people out of NDIS who need these. We’ll see.
So those are my Sunday thoughts.
It looks like I’m going to be using my words for an Online panel on March 11 – “Talking about Poverty: How to have conversations online, in the community and in the media” as a leadup event to the People Against Poverty conference mid-year. It’s free to come! And I’m terrified!
Let’s go!